Thursday, November 7, 2013

NWA 9/6/13

A Northwoods Almanac for 9/6 – 19, 2013 
           
Public Lands
            I recently led a hike on a state-owned property, and one of our many discussions concerned the amount of public land in Wisconsin – was it too much or too little? One of the participants noted that relative to our state neighbors to the east and west, we have the least public land. I looked it up, and she was right:
State                        Total acres            Public acres            % of total
Wisconsin             34,766,000            6,189,000            17.8%
Minnesota            50,954,000            11,975,000            23.5%
Michigan            36,357,000            10,231,000            28.1%
            Remarkably, New Jersey has a higher percentage of public lands – 18.3% - than Wisconsin. Who would have thought that?
As for Illinois, our favorite neighbor to the south, 4.1% of their land is in public ownership, a similar number to Indiana (4.5%) and Ohio (4.2%).
Leading the list by far with the highest percentages are the western states, which also have the highest percentages of non-arable lands.
            The numbers do little to resolve the value-laden question of whether we have too little or too much public land statewide or nationally; however, they lend some perspective from which to begin to judge.
            There is, of course, no “right” percentage. It’s helpful to consider that the amount of public land within each state came about through a unique combination of conserving highly desired areas, and conversely, through receiving lands that were tax-delinquent – lands that no one else wanted at the time.
            During European settlement of the Northwoods, the prevailing belief was the plow would follow the ax, a belief that was based more on boosterism than ecological understanding. In the early 1900s, land companies acquired cutover lands with hopes of selling them at a big profit to settlers. The Blue Grass Land Company of Minneapolis advertised land for a settlement near Eagle River describing the area as “suitable for all kinds of farming . . . the land is rich, clay-bottomed, making it the most productive hay land in America, just as good as those famed ‘blue grass’ lands of Kentucky.” The Blue Grass Land Company town, Farmington, eventually changed its name to St. Germain.
            The Wisconsin Central Railway had 1 million acres to sell, and distributed brochures such as “A Farm in Wisconsin Will Make Money for You from the Start: Crops Never Fail” accompanied by pictures of prosperous farms, since pictures don’t lie.
The University of Wisconsin’s College of Agriculture distributed 50,000 copies of a pamphlet entitled “A Handbook for the Homeseeker,” printed in English, German, and Norwegian, extolling the virtues of farming in northern Wisconsin. Since most immigrants couldn’t read English, the booklet was filled with pictures of prosperous farms and employed boosterism to entice farmers to the Northwoods: “After a most careful and thorough examination of the situation I am prepared to say without qualification that I believe no better place exists today for profitable sheep husbandry than northern Wisconsin. The reasons for this is the natural adaptation of the soil and climate, the free and bountiful growth of Kentucky blue grass, red and white clover, the easy culture of root crops; the ample growth of corn for forage purposes, and the fact that oats and peas flourish here remarkably. The climate is all that could be desired for sheep . . . With farms supplanting the forest, northern Wisconsin will not revert to a wilderness with the passing of the lumber industry, but will be occupied by a thrifty class of farmers whose well-directed, intelligent effort bring substantial, satisfactory returns from fields, flocks and herds.”
This boosterism finally lost its shine in the early 1920s, and land clearing in northern Wisconsin slowed to virtual halt. In 1921, one million acres in 17 northern counties were offered for sale as tax delinquent (out of a total of 11 million acres in these counties). By 1925, 2.25 million acres were offered for tax sale, and in 1927, 2.5 million acres. Four-fifths of these deeds went unsold. Nearly one-fourth of the Northwoods was tax delinquent land at this time, and only 18% had been purchased.
After 40 years of the State and Federal governments making every effort to create farms, only 6% of the total acreage of the Northwoods was in cultivated crops (only 1.4% in Vilas Co.).
Meanwhile, by 1925, only 1.5 million acres of saw timber were left in the 17 counties.
            At a 1929 hearing in Madison, a letter about an isolated farmer described the reality of getting crops to market in the Northwoods: “This man lived several miles from a highway. It had taken him two days to get his year’s crop – 30 bushels of potatoes – out to the highway and another half day to deliver it the rest of the way to a lumber camp where he received 35 cents a bushel [he made $10.50 for his entire crop]. The road from his farm to the highway was sometimes covered by as much as 4 feet of water making it impossible to get through. His children were often unable to get to school.”
These isolated farmers created an enormous tax burden on towns and counties because state laws required local governments to build roads and schools, and provide other community services, but the towns and counties were going bankrupt trying to do so.
T.W. Brazeau, representing Nekoosa Edwards Paper Company, said in 1929 there ought to be a “fine and imprisonment for anybody to go there and farm such land. A man ought not to be allowed to take his family in there and subject them to the starvation and deprivation some of them are doing, trying to make farms out of something that is not farming land . . . It is too bad there is not some kind of comprehensive and efficient scheme to take it (this land) out of private ownership and put it into state forests.”
The combination of tax delinquencies and the impossible requirement to provide community services forced the northern counties to request the once unimaginable authority to zone their lands, a remarkable reversal of the long established right of northern land owners to use their land as they desired.  The counties desperately needed to deter the ill-advised location of farms and to relocate poorly situated farms. They wanted to classify lands for recreation, agriculture, and forestry, and they wanted large-scale reforestation and the establishment of county forests. The legislature responded in 1929 by giving counties the right to zone for the regulation of agricultural lands, and to acquire lands by tax deeds and put them under the forest crop law.
Wisconsin’s Attorney General declared: “The county zoning statute is undoubtedly in the public welfare. The cutover areas of northern Wisconsin speak as eloquently against haphazard development as any city condition. The spotting of these lands with remote or abandoned farms, resulting in sparsely settled districts with insufficient population or value to support roads and schools, . . . the misdirected efforts to farm lands not well-suited to agriculture, with resulting personal grief and social loss; the far-reaching economic ill effects of stripping the state of timber, the fire hazard of the cutover lands, and the fire hazard of human habitation in their midst, all cry out for planning, for social direction, or individual effort.”
And then the coup-de-grass – the Depression struck and some northern towns reported tax delinquency at 70% of all their land, while many whole counties reported up to 50% of their land as tax delinquent.
Oneida County, the most virulent of counties originally opposed to forestry, ironically enacted the first state zoning laws in 1933, which were also the first of their kind to be enacted in the United States. As a “Special Circular, Making the Most of Oneida County Land” published in 1921 had noted, “The future of Oneida County depends on knowledge of essential facts governing past and present conditions and a determination to face these facts and to plan for the future.” And though there were still a few who said that zoning deprived settlers of their constitutional rights, economic failure at every turn exacted its final toll.
By the end of 1932, Oneida County owned over 200,000 acres of tax deed land. By 1935, 23 counties had adopted zoning ordinances. And by 1944, 2 million acres of county forests had been established.
            Meanwhile, the state established the Northern Highlands State Forest in 1925, and the American Legion State Forest in 1929.
The Federal Government followed suit and purchased 1.5 million acres during the 1930’s for the Nicolet and Chequamegon National Forests, and the Civilian Conservation Corps planted millions of trees in the 1930’s to help make forest restoration possible.
The total story is far larger than I have space for, but all of this is to say that any discussion of public land ownership needs historical perspective. It wasn’t a bunch of tree huggers who coerced various government entities into the creation of public lands, but a fierce economic reality that allowed no other choices, and which gave us, very thankfully, the reforested lands we enjoy so much today.

Sightings
On 8/26, Randy and Debbie Augustinak in Lac du Flambeau wrote: “Last evening, one of the warmest of the summer, we looked up from our wooded Lac du Flambeau yard to see what appeared to be a squadron of sleek and very nimble birds feasting on dragon flies just above the treetops. Trying to focus the binoculars on these darting birds was nearly impossible, but they clearly had forked tails and a distinct white bar on the underside of each wing . . .The accompanying photo confirms that the 2 dozen or so feathered fighter jets we'd been watching were in fact nighthawks, a first for us here.”
               On 8/20, Gary Bohlin wrote: “This evening on a Vilas County lake I saw an eagle swoop down for a fish, which it caught but was unable to fly away. It simply dropped itself in the water and wrestled with the large fish for a few moments, then began to butterfly stroke to shore, which was a good 150' away. What a sight to see those massive wings rowing to shore! The eagle headed for a partially submerged log on shore and had a 20-minute feast on a large mouth bass. As I was watching this whole ordeal with binoculars, it then leapt into the air and a second eagle came into my field of view and intercepted the first. There was mid-air contact, and they were only 20 to 30 feet above the water when the first eagle dropped what was left of the fish. At that point the second eagle plummeted to the water and simply plopped on the fish carcass. Then within a few seconds it spread its massive wings and elevated itself like a harrier jet. As the second eagle was gaining some momentum in swooped the first eagle and made in-flight contact. The thief eagle made a turn into the dense pine shoreline with the other eagle in tight pursuit. I instantly lost sight, but the snapping of branches and loud noises made me just put down the binoculars and smile thinking you sure can't buy a ticket to see that.”

Celestial Events
            On 9/8, look for Venus just north of the waxing crescent moon. On 9/9, look for Saturn about 2 degrees north of the moon. On 9/16, we are down to 12.5 hours of daylight, less than a week away from equinox.

Loon Study Addendum

            In my last column on a loon research project that took place on the Turtle-Flambeau Flowage, I noted that the failure of nearly two-thirds of the loon nests was “not cause for great concern given that loons are long-lived, often to 20 years or more, and thus don’t need high annual replacement rates.” This was the stated conclusion of the authors of the study. However, I failed to note that that an estimated 3000 loons died from botulism in Lake Michigan in 2012. This could have a significant effect on loon populations if it occurs annually, given that there are only an estimated 20,000 adult loons in the Great Lake states. Many thanks to Helen Williams on Crab Lake for reminding me of this.

No comments:

Post a Comment